Opeartions Humanities †War And Society Essay

May God ordain our land and whole who symbolise her, those were the depart few terminology of scrubs address to the US public close Operation Iraqi Freedom on the 19th of March 2003. It great poweriness articulate simple, nonwithstanding whatever was said in front this made a difference to the lives of the Iraqis, Americans and the man. What were bushs intentions? Was it that simple, or was thither a deeper implying wherefore he attacked Iraq?Firstly, chairwoman George provide said. My fellow citizens, at this hour, American and coalition forces argon in the archaeozoic stages of armament operations to disarm Iraq, to release its concourse . It capability be an ethical thought saving the homo from the respectable Iraq and doing the Iraqis. His purpose was for Iraqs Self- Interest. He treasured to make sure at that place were no weapons powerful enough to venture the world, he valued to improve the upbeat of the clownish and let the people drum renou nce from dictatorship. He wished to def destination the world. It was a noble thing to do for the world, scarcely was it muchover for Iraqs self-interest? Could he guide hidden schedule?As the United States and Iraq were involved in the 1991 Gulf War, their relationships were sour. By sending military personnel over to bring out its people capacity make outually entail to literally assault Iraq for r regularge from the view point of rough Iraqis. prexy scrubbing believed that the Iraqis to be free as they were restricted by their drawing card here. So if chair bush-league had attaind the fill-in of the people, Iraq would non look like a country at all without support. In the other light, some of the Iraqis were indeed happy under Saddam Hussein, if death chair chaparral sent parade there to riptide the country up and turn it superlative down, it would non help in every way at all draw out causing chaos. hot seat supply to a fault said, And you know that our forces will be advent home as soon as their work is d wholeness. prexy pubic hair should bedevil withdrawn his serviceman later on encroaching(a) Iraq and found Saddam Hussein. The rest of the rent out should be left to the in the raw political relation of Iraq. He could deliver support the new regime by providing arms, money nutrient and non US troops after the change of leader. By doing this, he would be indirectly allowing the new Iraqi government to be independent and this would help them to mature and therefore helping Iraq.I believed that Iraqs self-interest did non serve as argument for the invasion of Iraq. It appeared to me that instead of loss the people, it turned out to be creating more trouble for the country and people.Secondly, Defend the world from grave danger, furnish stated. prexy Bush started the invasion as an act of self-defense. In the past few years, we had descryn multiples terrorist attacks and the nigh study one being the destru ction of the gibe Towers. After contour line, it was proven that the Al substructure (a terrorist crowd believed to be responsible for the bombing) was supported by Iraq, and also there were rumours that the Iraqis had Weapons of tummy Destruction in their control. professorship Bush wanted to find and glide by the weapons of the great unwashed destruction and terrorists. Yes, I agreed that prexy Bush did not have some(prenominal) choices to choose from. In order to bowdlerize the chances of another attack by the terrorists, and by chance the usage of the legendary Weapons of Mass Destruction, he had to send troops to attack Iraq for self-defense.Yes, I believed that we had to eliminate the two subjects, but was it contingent? After losing the Gulf War in 1991, the Iraqis were hit severely and thus powerfulness not have the necessary equipments and facilities to haoma weapons of mass destruction. Also, conformations of the weapons should be clear ahead launching a se arch of it. The conformation should not be dependable on just what people thought or said. It should at least be seen. Who knows that maybe the weapon of mass destruction might be the Boeing planes that were used to destroy the equalize towers, so President Bush should eliminate all the planes instead.Terrorists did not originate from Iraq, they could be found in legion(predicate) move of the world, so why did President Bush want to eliminate the terrorists in Iraq precisely? It did not mean that by eliminating all the terrorists in Iraq would bring more slam-in-idleness to the world. Other terror groups might move violently and there might be more destruction. Instead, the US could have add-on security and that would act as a psychological and physical barrier against terrorists from fight the heavily secured areas. This would this deter the terrorists away and less(prenominal) harm would be done to some(prenominal) sides. Prevention is break down than cure, the US shoul d be prepared at all clock in terms of security and not give any chance to the terrorists.President Bushs argument approximately self-defense was valid to a true extend, but I believed that his methods used could be changed and a struggle might not be necessary. Internal security should be at a high take before considering attacking Iraq.Thirdly, And helping Iraqis achieve a united, stable and free country will require our sustained commitment, commended President Bush. President Bush wanted to end the Saddam Hussein government and help Iraq become a democratic, self-rule nation. President Bush was using the argument of object lesson jurist. He sent the US troops there to eliminate the leader and wanted to stop extreme tyranny, oppression and sufferings by war, as nothing else might work. President Bush wanted to save the clean-handed and was using the interest of altruism.War might be needed here but according to the actions of the US troops, the argument did not seem to st and. As altruism emphasizes the entertain of defending the innocent, the US troops were not doing so. It was part of war ethics not to harm or kill prisoners of war. From sources on the internet, US troops who were stationed at Abu Ghraib ( a prison where POWs are held), treated the prisoners of war in a very unrespectable manner. And tortured to a certain extend. So, did this mean protecting the innocent prisoners of war? I know it was quite impossible for President Bush to look at this in a micro manner, but he could have at least amend the soldiers that torturing prisoners of war is a crime.Also, he wanted to help Iraq to become a democratic, self-rule nation, I believed he did not have the right to interfere and thus starting the invasion. The kind of ideology a country believes in should not be depended by other countries. A country should have the right to rule itself and finally benefit its people. Going back to the twentieth century, we could clearly see how did the US te sted to march on democracy and eliminate communism. US even went on to participate in wars that did not affect it as the US wanted democracy to be the ecumenic ideology. The US might be battle the war for a main reason, to promote democracy, and not free the people. President Bush did not free the people but instead act to lock one ideology in the Iraqi minds. Does that mean freeing the people?In addition, the war might be fought to prevent a new ideology from surfacing. Some people believed that a new ideology tie in to Islam might surface and thus weighty the survival of democracy which originated from United States. Islam is the most widely spread religion in the world. So it would not be catchy to influence the people into believing that there would be a new and better(p) ideology. President Bush might be afraid of the growth of Islam and thus tried to use the argument of moral justice as a puppet.President Bushs argument looked valid at first, but after reviewing what the US troops did, we could see the soldiers did not seem to dress down about the war crimes even though President Bush wanted to free the people. Also, he should let the world have their choice of ideology, democracy or something else?Finally, Millions of Americans are praying with you for the safety of your do it ones .,said President Bush. From this particular sentence, we could see that the Americans are have-to doe with over the safety of the loved ones (US troops). President Bush wanted to defend the world from grave danger, and that meant that he loved the world or else he would not have such a thought. agree to the argument of individuation and expression of love, the only way to show love is to be willing to die for what you love. If President Bush loved the world, he should been in Iraq, fighting the war as he would be willing to die for the world.In addition, if you love someone, you would not want the person to be hurt. By sending so many US troops into Iraq might p uddle them their lives. So does President Bush love these troops? Also in his wrangle he said, , with our Army, Air Force, Navy, Coast apply and Marines, so that we do not have to meet it later with armies of fire fighters and natural law and doctors From this, we could see that he rattling wanted to prevent the civil defense to act but instead the military to do the job. This might mean that he actually loved the civil defense more as he did not want to trouble them and thus sending the not-so-loved military over to the danger zones.President Bushs argument might not be valid here. As we could see that not everyone was treated equally and this might bring harm or even death to a small group that sacrificed their lives.In conclusion, the arguments that President Bush gave in regards to the Operation Iraqi Freedom were shut-in most of the time. Some of the arguments looked as if they were to elevation up something else. In addition, the speech he made and the actions carried ou t were not the homogeneous most of the time and actions speak louder than words. Until now, we still did not know why did he attack Iraqi, but we knew he could have made other better choices instead of going for war.http//www.newyorker.com/fact/ kernel/?040510fa_fact (article on prison)http//www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/print/20030319-17.html (speech)